RF Front-End Design Platform

Design simulation-ready
signal chains

An AI assisted environment for building, analyzing, and communicating RF signal chain architectures.

The multi-stage optimization problem

RF front-end design requires iterating between topology, component selection, and validation. Current tools are fragmented across different software.

Stage 1

Topology selection

Develop architectures based on your specs. Superheterodyne, direct conversion, or custom topologies. Explains tradeoffs. Refine through conversation until the architecture fits your constraints.

Stage 2

Component selection

Finds real components that fit your topology and system specs. Considers gain, noise figure, linearity, power, cost. Shows alternatives and tradeoffs.

Stage 3

Performance validation

Calculates cascaded performance across the chain. Identifies bottlenecks and first-failure points. Margin analysis. Iterate until specs are met with acceptable margins.

Stage 4

Simulation-ready export

Block diagram, level plan, component list, and design assumptions documented. Export to ADS or other tools. Traceable decisions for team review.

See it in action

Conversational interface that guides you through the complete design process

Product demo coming soon

The complete design cycle

Complete, internally consistent signal chain specifications with full traceability

ƒ

Frequency plan

Node-by-node signal levels across the entire RF chain. Automatic LO synthesis. Spur identification and risk assessment. IF selection with margin analysis.

G

Gain budget

Stage-by-stage gain allocation. Automatic compression point tracking. Headroom calculation at each node. First-failure point identification.

N

Noise budget

Cascaded noise figure calculation. Per-stage contribution analysis. Sensitivity verification against requirements. Conservative assumption tracking.

IP

Linearity budget

IIP3 and P1dB allocation across stages. Intermodulation product tracking. Dynamic range analysis. Distortion margin calculation.

Why this matters

Incumbent tools stay fragmented because it benefits them. Engineers need integration.

Faster iteration cycles — Complete design rounds efficiently

Single integrated tool — Topology, components, and validation in one place

Validated architectures — Performance checks catch issues during design

Export to existing tools — Ready for ADS or your preferred simulator when you're done

Get Access

Be among the first to experience the future of RF design